Constructivism


Overview

Constructivism is an influential learning theory that emphasizes the active role of learners in building their own knowledge and understanding through experiences, social interactions, and reflection (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978; Bruner, 1961; von Glasersfeld, 1995). This theory has been shaped by several key thinkers over the 20th century. Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development laid the foundation, proposing that children actively construct their understanding of the world (Piaget, 1936). Lev Vygotsky expanded on this with his concept of the Zone of Proximal Development, highlighting the crucial role of social interaction in learning (Vygotsky, 1978). Jerome Bruner further developed constructivist ideas by advocating for discovery learning, where learners actively explore and problem-solve (Bruner, 1961). Ernst von Glasersfeld introduced radical constructivism, emphasizing the subjective nature of knowledge construction (von Glasersfeld, 1995).

In educational practice, constructivism translates to learner-centered approaches where students are active participants rather than passive recipients of information. Teachers act as facilitators, guiding students through experiences that allow them to construct their own understanding (Piaget, 1936; Vygotsky, 1978; Bruner, 1961; von Glasersfeld, 1995). This approach prioritizes hands-on learning, problem-solving, and collaborative activities, encouraging learners to build knowledge through personal and social experiences (Bruner, 1961; von Glasersfeld, 1995). By doing so, constructivism aims to create more meaningful and lasting learning outcomes, as knowledge is actively constructed rather than simply transmitted.

 

2024 | Photo by Christophe Ferron| Unsplash

Implications for Instructional Design:

Constructivism has significant implications for instructional design, as it shifts the focus from content delivery to learner-centered experiences (Jonassen, 1999). When designing learning experiences from a constructivist perspective, instructional designers should create authentic, real-world tasks and problems that encourage learners to actively engage with the content and construct their own understanding (Savery & Duffy, 1995). Providing opportunities for social interaction, collaboration, and discussion is crucial, as these support the co-construction of knowledge (Vygotsky, 1978). Instructional designers should also offer scaffolding and support to help learners navigate complex tasks and develop new skills within their Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) (Vygotsky, 1978). Encouraging reflection and metacognition is essential to help learners become aware of their own learning processes and strategies (Schön, 1983). Finally, assessments should be designed to emphasize the application of knowledge and skills in authentic contexts, rather than mere recall of information (Wiggins, 1998).

Strengths and Limitations in Higher Education:

In the context of higher education, constructivism offers several strengths, such as promoting deep learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Constructivist approaches can help students develop transferable skills and prepare them for real-world challenges. However, constructivism also has some limitations in this context. It can be time-consuming and resource-intensive to design and implement constructivist learning experiences, particularly in large classes. Additionally, some students may struggle with the open-ended nature of constructivist activities and require more structure and guidance.


Scenario

Topic: Sustainable Nutritional Planning

Scenario: In an online nutrition course, learners are tasked with developing a sustainable meal plan for a specific target population (e.g., athletes, elderly, or individuals with dietary restrictions). They must consider factors such as nutrient density, seasonal produce, food accessibility, and cultural preferences. Learners work in small groups to research best practices, analyze case studies, and create a comprehensive proposal that addresses the unique nutritional needs of the target population. Throughout the project, learners engage in discussions, provide peer feedback, and iteratively refine their plans based on instructor guidance and new information.

ZPD Skills:

  • Apply principles of sustainable nutrition to meal planning contexts
  • Collaborate effectively in a virtual team environment
  • Communicate complex ideas and proposals to diverse stakeholders

The sustainable nutritional planning scenario aims to develop several key skills within the learners' Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Firstly, learners will apply principles of sustainable nutrition to meal planning contexts, which requires them to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Secondly, collaborating effectively in a virtual team environment is a crucial skill that learners will develop through this project, as they navigate the challenges of remote communication and coordination. Finally, communicating complex ideas and proposals to diverse stakeholders is a skill that learners will practice throughout the project, as they present their meal plans to peers, instructors, and potentially even the target population.

By engaging in this authentic, problem-based learning experience, learners will have the opportunity to develop these skills with the support and guidance of their peers and instructor, gradually internalizing the knowledge and strategies necessary for independent application in future contexts.

Scaffolding strategy:

  • Provide learners with a structured project template that outlines key components of a sustainable meal plan, along with guiding questions and resources for each section.

This scaffolding helps learners break down the complex task into manageable steps and ensures that all essential elements are addressed. The template may include sections such as nutrient requirements, seasonal ingredient selection, food sourcing, and meal preparation guidelines.

Social constructivist approach:

  • Implement a peer review process where groups provide feedback on each other's draft proposals.
  • Encourage learners to engage in constructive dialogue, asking questions, offering suggestions, and sharing insights from their own research.

This collaborative process facilitates the co-construction of knowledge and helps learners refine their understanding of sustainable nutritional planning principles. Learners can discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with creating meal plans for specific populations, share resources, and brainstorm creative solutions.

To address the diverse needs of learners, the instructor can provide differentiated support, such as additional resources for students with less background knowledge in nutrition, or more advanced challenges for those with prior experience in meal planning. The instructor can also facilitate small group discussions tailored to specific learner needs, ensuring that all students have the opportunity to contribute and learn from their peers. For example, learners with expertise in certain dietary restrictions can share their knowledge with others, while those with strong research skills can guide their peers in finding relevant information.

 


References:

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32.

Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Piaget, J. (1936). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London, UK: Falmer Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.